THE META REPORT NAME IS TOO LONG, TOO DAMN LONG (n°76)

Patch 3.15 - Week 1 - I draw ny line here. I report whatever the rank I want! (semicit)

Valentino (Legna) Vazzoler
2022-09-21

Data

Number of Master Players: 4272

Number of HighDiamond 1 Players: 6893

Number of (Ranked) Master matches analysed 129935 or 259870 games.

Number of (Ranked) ~HighDiamond matches analysed 306913 or 613826 games.

Last Update: 2022-09-21 17:44

Games

Patch 3.15 - Week 1 - by the Numbers1
Characteristic Master2 ~HighDiamond2
N = 229,0093 N = 129,9353 N = 436,4083 N = 306,9133
Status
Ranked 129,935 (57%) 306,913 (70%)
ThePathOfChampions 54,084 (24%) 79,942 (18%)
Other 41,219 (18%) 45,405 (10%)
Friendly Bo3 2,274 (1.0%) 1,507 (0.3%)
Labs 1,497 (0.7%) 2,641 (0.6%)
Server
Americas 86,981 (38%) 49,660 (38%) 162,340 (37%) 114,534 (37%)
Apac 71,456 (31%) 36,781 (28%) 129,454 (30%) 87,961 (29%)
Europe 70,572 (31%) 43,494 (33%) 144,614 (33%) 104,418 (34%)
1 Max datetime recovered: 2022-09-21 14:52:48.41445 UTC from 2022-09-14 18:00:00 to 2022-09-21 18:00:00 UTC
2 EU Master 1414/1415 NA Master 1619/1626 APAC Master 1239/1242
3 n(%) took from the number of matches. When the data is analysed the size is double since we account each different player

Account

Shard/Server Total
Americas Apac Europe
Player Rank
Master 1,619 (15%) 1,239 (11%) 1,414 (13%) 4,272 (38%)
Diamond 2,567 (23%) 2,016 (18%) 2,310 (21%) 6,893 (62%)
Total 4,186 (37%) 3,255 (29%) 3,724 (33%) 11,165 (100%)

Regions

Play Rate

Plot

The Gini Index is a measure of heterogeneity so, in this case and in simpler terms, how much the play rates are similar. The Index goes (when normalized like here) \(\in [0, 1]\) and it’s equal to 1 when there’s a single value with 100% play rate or 0 when all play rates are equal. Of course a Gini Index of 1 needs to be avoided but it’s not like the aim should be 0. As said, it’s just to add some additional tools.

Table

Region Play Rate
Relative Frequencies by Inclusion Rate of a Region
Freq Shard
America Apac Europe
Regions
ShadowIsles 16.83% 16.69% 17.88% 16.10%
Bilgewater 15.01% 15.63% 13.48% 15.60%
Freljord 9.86% 9.76% 9.45% 10.34%
Ionia 9.30% 9.27% 8.91% 9.65%
Piltover 8.71% 8.13% 8.99% 9.14%
Shurima 8.69% 9.04% 9.56% 7.56%
Noxus 8.62% 8.30% 8.19% 9.36%
BandleCity 7.74% 8.07% 8.43% 6.77%
Demacia 5.95% 5.88% 6.44% 5.62%
MtTargon 5.34% 5.22% 5.24% 5.56%
Runeterra
Evelynn 1.67% 1.77% 1.17% 1.98%
Kayn 0.87% 0.94% 0.86% 0.81%
Jax 0.79% 0.70% 0.97% 0.76%
Bard 0.34% 0.33% 0.15% 0.52%
Jhin 0.26% 0.26% 0.29% 0.24%
total 3.94% 4.00% 3.44% 4.30%
Patch 3.15 - Week 1 Ranked games from 2022-09-14 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-09-21 18:00:00 UTC Source: Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API Last Update: 2022-09-21 15:40:47.980072

Play Rate by number of Cards

Plot

Table

Region Play Rate
Relative Frequencies by number of times a Card within a Region is included in a Deck
Freq Shard
America Apac Europe
Regions
Bilgewater 18.82% 19.78% 16.61% 19.59%
ShadowIsles 18.38% 17.99% 19.70% 17.70%
Ionia 10.34% 10.37% 10.03% 10.56%
Piltover 7.96% 7.44% 8.03% 8.50%
BandleCity 7.94% 8.37% 8.67% 6.82%
Shurima 7.92% 8.12% 8.72% 7.03%
Noxus 7.36% 7.14% 6.99% 7.92%
Freljord 6.84% 6.51% 6.75% 7.28%
Demacia 5.96% 5.93% 6.38% 5.65%
MtTargon 5.23% 5.10% 5.11% 5.48%
Runeterra 3.26% 3.24% 3.02% 3.48%
Patch 3.15 - Week 1 Ranked games from 2022-09-14 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-09-21 18:00:00 UTC Source: Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API Last Update: 2022-09-21 15:40:47.980072

Champions Combinations

Play Rates

Plot

from Master

Source: Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API. Last Update: 2022-09-21 15:45:23.271054 FALSE

from Diamond

Source: Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API. Last Update: 2022-09-21 15:45:23.843163 FALSE

Day by day

Hourly/Dialy lines

Stacked Playrates

Each playrate is stacked upon the other with the decks with the highest overall play-rate (the written value) being at the bottom.

Stacked Games

Win Rates

Meta Decks

Win rates of the most played combination of champions. Play Rate \(\geq 1\%\) in at least one of the servers.

Format changed to replicate the one used in the Meta - page

Underdog

Top Win rates of the top10 best performing least played combination of champions. Play rate \(\in [0.1%, 1%)\)

Match Ups

Regarding MU, this is not the most accurate estimation you can get from my data. If you want a better picture of the current meta it would be better to look at the dedicated MU-page where I use all “Ranked” games with the current sets of buffs and nerfs. While one may object I don’t account for optimizations and differences in skills acquired during the weeks, the overall number of games / sample size makes them a better source of information. So, in case, please refer to the MU - page for a better “meta-investigation”.

Match-up Grid

The win rates on the grid are among the 10 most played champion combination.

WR (WRmeta) Pirates (BW/NX) Heimerdinger/Norra (BC/SI) Gangplank/Sejuani (BW/FR) Trundle Timelines (FR/PZ) Gwen/Katarina (NX/SI) Kindred/Nasus (SI/SH) Nami/Twisted Fate (BW/IO) Evelynn/Viego (RU/SI) Poppy/Taric (DE/MT) Ezreal/Kennen (IO/PZ)
Pirates (BW/NX)
54.1%
51.6%
NA
NA
42.5%
(40.1% - 44.9%)
38.4%
(35.9% - 41.0%)
56.1%
(53.2% - 59.0%)
51.5%
(48.4% - 54.6%)
62.9%
(59.4% - 66.3%)
46.7%
(43.2% - 50.2%)
45.7%
(41.9% - 49.6%)
62.1%
(58.3% - 65.8%)
60.5%
(55.9% - 64.8%)
Heimerdinger/Norra (BC/SI)
50.5%
48.6%
57.5%
(55.1% - 59.9%)
NA
NA
51.1%
(48.3% - 53.8%)
30.4%
(27.7% - 33.3%)
47.5%
(44.3% - 50.7%)
54.3%
(50.7% - 57.9%)
42.8%
(39.1% - 46.5%)
52.0%
(48.0% - 55.9%)
46.7%
(42.9% - 50.6%)
55.2%
(50.7% - 59.7%)
Gangplank/Sejuani (BW/FR)
54.8%
53.2%
61.6%
(59.0% - 64.1%)
48.9%
(46.2% - 51.7%)
NA
NA
55.0%
(51.8% - 58.3%)
54.8%
(51.2% - 58.3%)
60.5%
(56.9% - 63.9%)
50.5%
(46.9% - 54.1%)
38.4%
(34.7% - 42.2%)
52.0%
(48.0% - 56.1%)
52.7%
(47.8% - 57.6%)
Trundle Timelines (FR/PZ)
51.7%
48.8%
43.9%
(41.0% - 46.8%)
69.6%
(66.7% - 72.3%)
45.0%
(41.7% - 48.2%)
NA
NA
48.6%
(44.6% - 52.8%)
46.4%
(41.7% - 51.2%)
36.0%
(31.6% - 40.6%)
56.6%
(51.6% - 61.5%)
46.4%
(41.5% - 51.4%)
38.5%
(33.2% - 44.0%)
Gwen/Katarina (NX/SI)
53.4%
50.0%
48.5%
(45.4% - 51.6%)
52.5%
(49.3% - 55.7%)
45.2%
(41.7% - 48.8%)
51.4%
(47.2% - 55.4%)
NA
NA
54.7%
(50.2% - 59.2%)
51.4%
(46.5% - 56.3%)
42.1%
(37.2% - 47.2%)
48.0%
(42.8% - 53.2%)
46.3%
(40.5% - 52.1%)
Kindred/Nasus (SI/SH)
49.6%
45.5%
37.1%
(33.7% - 40.6%)
45.7%
(42.1% - 49.3%)
39.5%
(36.1% - 43.1%)
53.6%
(48.8% - 58.3%)
45.3%
(40.8% - 49.8%)
NA
NA
53.9%
(48.0% - 59.7%)
41.8%
(36.2% - 47.6%)
55.5%
(49.4% - 61.5%)
34.3%
(28.4% - 40.5%)
Nami/Twisted Fate (BW/IO)
54.4%
51.4%
53.3%
(49.8% - 56.8%)
57.2%
(53.5% - 60.9%)
49.5%
(45.9% - 53.1%)
64.0%
(59.4% - 68.4%)
48.6%
(43.7% - 53.5%)
46.1%
(40.3% - 52.0%)
NA
NA
56.7%
(50.9% - 62.4%)
33.3%
(27.6% - 39.4%)
45.4%
(39.1% - 51.8%)
Evelynn/Viego (RU/SI)
53.6%
52.3%
54.3%
(50.4% - 58.1%)
48.0%
(44.1% - 52.0%)
61.6%
(57.8% - 65.3%)
43.4%
(38.5% - 48.4%)
57.9%
(52.8% - 62.8%)
58.2%
(52.4% - 63.8%)
43.3%
(37.6% - 49.1%)
NA
NA
52.6%
(46.2% - 58.9%)
46.7%
(39.4% - 54.2%)
Poppy/Taric (DE/MT)
52.9%
50.1%
37.9%
(34.2% - 41.7%)
53.3%
(49.4% - 57.1%)
48.0%
(43.9% - 52.0%)
53.6%
(48.6% - 58.5%)
52.0%
(46.8% - 57.2%)
44.5%
(38.5% - 50.6%)
66.7%
(60.6% - 72.4%)
47.4%
(41.1% - 53.8%)
NA
NA
57.1%
(49.3% - 64.7%)
Ezreal/Kennen (IO/PZ)
52.2%
49.6%
39.5%
(35.2% - 44.1%)
44.8%
(40.3% - 49.3%)
47.3%
(42.4% - 52.2%)
61.5%
(56.0% - 66.8%)
53.7%
(47.9% - 59.5%)
65.7%
(59.5% - 71.6%)
54.6%
(48.2% - 60.9%)
53.3%
(45.8% - 60.6%)
42.9%
(35.3% - 50.7%)
NA
NA
MatchUp values from Ranked games of the player who attended the last Seasonal Tournament Order of the Archetypes based on the playrate. Source: Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API

LoR-Meta Index (LMI)

Note: Games from Master Rank only

Tier0 with LMI \(\geq\) 97.5 Tier1 with LMI \(\in [85, 97.5)\) Tier2 with LMI \(\in [60, 85)\) Tier3- with LMI \(<\) 60

The LMI 2 3 is an Index I developed to measure the performance of decks in the metagame. For those who are familiar with basic statistical concept I wrote a document to explain the theory behind it: , it’s very similar to vicioussyndicate (vS) Meta Score from their data reaper report. The score of each deck is not just their “strength”, it takes in consideration both play rates and win rates that’s why I prefer to say it measure the “performance”. The values range from 0 to 100 and the higher the value, the higher is the performance.

Win Marathons Leaders

Top3 Players (or more in case of ties) from each server that had the highest amount of consecutive wins with the same archetype. The provided deckcode is the one played in the last win found.

Top3 Biggest Win Streak by Server
Cumulative wins with the same Archetype
Player Result Archetype Deck Code
Americas
Queen Elizabeth 17 Gangplank/Sejuani (BW/FR)
Trivo 16 Gangplank/Sejuani (BW/FR)
FNX Paimera 15 Miss Fortune/Quinn (BW/DE)
leokian 15 Heimerdinger/Norra (BC/SI)
Apac
무결처형 17 Ezreal/Kennen (IO/PZ)
Parsival 15 Thresh/Viego (IO/SI)
CKG 来点格温涩图 14 Viego (SI/SH)
INV DISCO 14 Evelynn/Viego (RU/SI)
Europe
lanetlilimon 15 Nami/Twisted Fate (BW/IO)
Osk 15 Aurelion Sol/Trundle (FR/MT)
CamiIlentee 14 Kindred/Norra (BC/SI)
Eltyr 14 Gwen/Katarina (NX/SI)
Rafael 14 Heimerdinger/Norra (BC/SI)
Games from all Master are collected each hour adding up to the last 20 matches. Unlikely but possible to miss games in case of high frequency games. Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API

Cards Presence (at Master)

Play Rate

Top 3 Play Rates by Region

Forgotten Cards

Cards that couldn’t find place even in a meme deck.

Not-Standard Archetype Names

Names and rules for the “non standard archetypes” which are not defined by Champion+Regions

Archetype ~Fix
Deck Source
ASZ - Sivir Ionia Akshan/Sivir (IO/SH) or Sivir/Zed or Akshan/Sivir/Zed
BandleTree 3 copies of BandleTree
Camavoran Deserter 2+ Legion Deserter and 2+ Viego
Dragons (DE/MT) (DE/MT) Decks with *at least* Shyvana and ASol
Marauder (NX/FR) Two to Three copies of Both Legion Marauder and Strength in Numbers
Mistwraith Allegiance Three copies of both Mistwraith and Wraithcaller
Pack Your Catalogue (Regions) Three copies of Go Hard and 2+ of Catalogue of Regrets
Pirates (BW/NX) BW/NX deck with Miss Fortune and any of Twisted Fate, Gangplank
Plunder Pandemonium (Regions) 2+ Powder Pandemonium and at least 32 Bilgewater Cards
RubinBait - <Champ> Burn Deck using <Champ> to bait mulligan
Sentinel Control PnZ/SI deck any combination of Elise/Jayce/Vi
Kindred Control PnZ/SI deck any combination of Elise/Jayce/Vi AND Kindred
SunDisc Mono Shurima with 1+ Sun Disc - without Rek'Sai
Tri-Beam (NX/PZ) (NX/PZ) deck with at least 2 copies of Tri-Beam
Trundle Timelines (FR/PZ) Trundle and Concurrent Timelines
Viktor - Shellfolk Viktor + at least one of Curious Shellfolk/Mirror Mage + at least 2 Trinket Trade

Legal bla bla

This content was created under Riot Games ‘Legal Jibber Jabber’ policy using assets owned by Riot Games. Riot Games does not endorse or sponsor this project.


  1. HighDiamond are defined as “players who played against Master player in a Ranked games but are not Master themselves”↩︎

  2. LMI - Early Theory↩︎

  3. LMI - Adding a Ban Index↩︎