THE META REPORT NAME IS TOO LONG, TOO DAMN LONG (n°81)

Patch 3.17 - Week 2 - I’m sorry for the person the players have become with Seraqueen being released in Legends of Runeterra.


Author

Affiliation

Valentino (Legna) Vazzoler

 

Published

Oct. 25, 2022

DOI


Data

Number of Master Players: 1884

Number of HighDiamond

HighDiamond are defined as “players who played against Master player in a Ranked games but are not Master themselves”
1 Players: 6029

Number of (Ranked) Master matches analysed 59071 or 118142 games.

Number of (Ranked) ~HighDiamond matches analysed 237966 or 475932 games.

Last Update: 2022-10-26 18:55

Patch 3.17 - Week 2 - by the Numbers1
Characteristic Master2 ~HighDiamond2
N = 96,5803 N = 59,0713 N = 329,8503 N = 237,9663
Status
    Ranked 59,071 (61%) 237,966 (72%)
    ThePathOfChampions 20,649 (21%) 57,371 (17%)
    Other 14,707 (15%) 31,695 (9.6%)
    Friendly Bo3 1,539 (1.6%) 1,575 (0.5%)
    Labs 614 (0.6%) 1,243 (0.4%)
Server
    Americas 39,931 (41%) 23,260 (39%) 126,983 (38%) 92,001 (39%)
    Apac 29,264 (30%) 17,354 (29%) 98,165 (30%) 67,631 (28%)
    Europe 27,385 (28%) 18,457 (31%) 104,702 (32%) 78,334 (33%)
1 Max datetime recovered: 2022-10-26 14:46:23.50950 UTC from 2022-10-19 18:00:00 to 2022-10-26 18:00:00 UTC
2 EU Master 586/586 NA Master 759/763 APAC Master 539/539
3 n(%) took from the number of matches. When the data is analysed the size is double since we account each different player
Shard/Server Total
Americas Apac Europe
Player Rank
    Master 759 (9.6%) 539 (6.8%) 586 (7.4%) 1,884 (24%)
    Diamond 2,316 (29%) 1,679 (21%) 2,034 (26%) 6,029 (76%)
Total 3,075 (39%) 2,218 (28%) 2,620 (33%) 7,913 (100%)

Regions

Play Rate

The Gini Index is a measure of heterogeneity so, in this case and in simpler terms, how much the play rates are similar. The Index goes (when normalized like here) [0,1] and it’s equal to 1 when there’s a single value with 100% play rate or 0 when all play rates are equal. Of course a Gini Index of 1 needs to be avoided but it’s not like the aim should be 0. As said, it’s just to add some additional tools.

Region Play Rate
Relative Frequencies by Inclusion Rate of a Region
Freq Shard
America Apac Europe
Regions
Piltover 19.92% 19.13% 21.73% 19.21%
Noxus 16.55% 16.31% 17.96% 15.53%
Demacia 12.60% 12.72% 12.30% 12.74%
ShadowIsles 10.60% 11.09% 11.29% 9.35%
Ionia 9.38% 7.88% 8.13% 12.44%
MtTargon 6.04% 6.37% 5.19% 6.44%
Bilgewater 5.91% 6.54% 5.19% 5.80%
Shurima 5.16% 5.78% 4.81% 4.71%
Freljord 3.34% 3.31% 3.50% 3.23%
BandleCity 2.69% 2.55% 3.08% 2.50%
Runeterra
Varus 2.47% 2.56% 2.02% 2.77%
Jax 2.32% 2.55% 2.05% 2.28%
Jhin 2.10% 2.04% 2.02% 2.26%
Kayn 0.76% 0.97% 0.57% 0.65%
Evelynn 0.08% 0.11% 0.10% 0.03%
Bard 0.07% 0.09% 0.06% 0.07%
total 7.80% 8.33% 6.81% 8.07%
Patch 3.17 - Week 2 Ranked games from 2022-10-19 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-26 18:00:00 UTC Source: Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API Last Update: 2022-10-26 16:55:03.35197

Play Rate by number of Cards

Region Play Rate
Relative Frequencies by number of times a Card within a Region is included in a Deck
Freq Shard
America Apac Europe
Regions
Piltover 24.68% 23.69% 27.52% 23.27%
Noxus 13.49% 13.28% 14.24% 13.05%
Demacia 12.05% 12.17% 12.11% 11.84%
ShadowIsles 10.06% 10.48% 10.44% 9.17%
Ionia 8.58% 7.16% 7.49% 11.40%
Runeterra 8.32% 8.71% 7.30% 8.79%
Bilgewater 5.84% 6.50% 5.05% 5.76%
MtTargon 5.84% 6.10% 4.91% 6.37%
Shurima 5.35% 6.21% 4.87% 4.71%
Freljord 3.33% 3.31% 3.54% 3.17%
BandleCity 2.47% 2.40% 2.54% 2.48%
Patch 3.17 - Week 2 Ranked games from 2022-10-19 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-26 18:00:00 UTC Source: Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API Last Update: 2022-10-26 16:55:03.35197

Champions Combinations

Play Rates

Champions
Play Rate
America
Apac
Europe
Ezreal/Seraphine (NX/PZ)
14.9%
14.7%
18.9%
11.3%
Seraphine/Viktor (IO/PZ)
6.6%
3.9%
4.0%
12.3%
Hecarim/Zed (IO/SI)
4.6%
5.1%
5.4%
3.3%
Jax/Vayne (DE/RU)
4.1%
4.8%
3.7%
3.7%
Annie/Jhin (NX/RU)
4.1%
4.0%
3.9%
4.5%
Rumble/Vayne (DE/NX)
4.0%
3.5%
4.3%
4.5%
Seraphine/Viktor (PZ/SI)
3.1%
3.8%
3.1%
2.2%
Vayne/Zed (DE/IO)
3.0%
2.4%
2.6%
4.0%
Pantheon/Vayne (DE/MT)
2.8%
2.5%
3.3%
2.7%
Pantheon/Varus (MT/RU)
2.7%
2.7%
1.5%
3.7%
Gwen/Vayne (DE/SI)
2.4%
1.8%
3.3%
2.3%
Aphelios/Seraphine (MT/PZ)
2.2%
2.7%
2.3%
1.4%
Miss Fortune/Swain (BW/NX)
1.8%
2.2%
1.4%
1.8%
Pyke/Rek'Sai (BW/SH)
1.6%
1.7%
1.9%
1.2%
Pirates (BW/NX)
1.4%
1.4%
1.1%
1.6%
Fiora/Vayne (DE/PZ)
1.2%
1.0%
1.9%
1.0%
Akshan/Varus (RU/SH)
1.0%
0.9%
1.4%
0.7%
Viktor - Shellfolk
1.0%
0.6%
2.0%
0.4%
Trundle/Tryndamere (FR/SI)
1.0%
1.2%
1.2%
0.4%
Kayn/Vayne (DE/RU)
0.9%
1.2%
0.8%
0.8%
1–20 of 1526 rows
...

Source: Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API. Last Update: 2022-10-26 16:56:42.882781 FALSE

Champions
Play Rate
America
Apac
Europe
Ezreal/Seraphine (NX/PZ)
13.7%
13.6%
15.7%
12.1%
Hecarim/Zed (IO/SI)
5.6%
5.5%
6.7%
4.7%
Rumble/Vayne (DE/NX)
5.0%
4.5%
5.5%
5.2%
Seraphine/Viktor (IO/PZ)
4.0%
2.2%
2.4%
7.3%
Annie/Jhin (NX/RU)
3.9%
3.8%
3.9%
3.9%
Vayne/Zed (DE/IO)
3.8%
3.5%
3.9%
4.2%
Jax/Vayne (DE/RU)
3.3%
4.1%
2.7%
3.0%
Gwen/Vayne (DE/SI)
3.2%
2.9%
3.9%
2.8%
Pantheon/Vayne (DE/MT)
3.0%
3.0%
2.7%
3.1%
Pantheon/Varus (MT/RU)
2.8%
2.6%
1.6%
4.1%
Seraphine/Viktor (PZ/SI)
2.5%
3.0%
2.6%
1.7%
Miss Fortune/Swain (BW/NX)
1.7%
1.8%
1.2%
1.9%
Pyke/Rek'Sai (BW/SH)
1.6%
1.6%
1.9%
1.3%
Pirates (BW/NX)
1.2%
1.3%
1.0%
1.4%
Swain/Twisted Fate (BW/NX)
1.2%
1.2%
1.2%
1.1%
Akshan/Varus (RU/SH)
1.2%
1.0%
1.6%
1.0%
Kayn/Vayne (DE/RU)
1.1%
1.3%
1.2%
0.9%
Aphelios/Seraphine (MT/PZ)
1.1%
1.5%
1.1%
0.7%
Fiora/Vayne (DE/PZ)
1.1%
1.0%
1.5%
0.9%
Gwen/Katarina (NX/SI)
1.1%
1.1%
1.0%
1.0%
1–20 of 3540 rows
...

Source: Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API. Last Update: 2022-10-26 16:56:43.447567 FALSE

Day by day

Each playrate is stacked upon the other with the decks with the highest overall play-rate (the written value) being at the bottom.

Win Rates

Win rates of the most played combination of champions. Play Rate 1% in at least one of the servers.

Format changed to replicate the one used in the Meta - page

Archetype
WinRate
#Win
#Games
PlayRate
Conf.Interval
Ezreal/Seraphine (NX/PZ)
53.2%
9342
17561
14.9%
(52.5% - 53.9%)
Seraphine/Viktor (IO/PZ)
56.0%
4333
7740
6.6%
(54.9% - 57.1%)
Hecarim/Zed (IO/SI)
48.5%
2634
5430
4.6%
(47.2% - 49.8%)
Jax/Vayne (DE/RU)
54.1%
2646
4893
4.1%
(52.7% - 55.5%)
Annie/Jhin (NX/RU)
52.8%
2573
4873
4.1%
(51.4% - 54.2%)
Rumble/Vayne (DE/NX)
49.9%
2370
4754
4.0%
(48.4% - 51.3%)
Seraphine/Viktor (PZ/SI)
53.7%
1974
3678
3.1%
(52.0% - 55.3%)
Vayne/Zed (DE/IO)
53.3%
1872
3515
3.0%
(51.6% - 54.9%)
Pantheon/Vayne (DE/MT)
52.8%
1747
3310
2.8%
(51.1% - 54.5%)
Pantheon/Varus (MT/RU)
50.5%
1599
3164
2.7%
(48.8% - 52.3%)
Gwen/Vayne (DE/SI)
50.3%
1427
2838
2.4%
(48.4% - 52.1%)
Aphelios/Seraphine (MT/PZ)
54.1%
1378
2548
2.2%
(52.1% - 56.0%)
Miss Fortune/Swain (BW/NX)
55.4%
1207
2180
1.8%
(53.3% - 57.5%)
Pyke/Rek'Sai (BW/SH)
48.2%
901
1869
1.6%
(45.9% - 50.5%)
Pirates (BW/NX)
51.8%
851
1644
1.4%
(49.3% - 54.2%)
Fiora/Vayne (DE/PZ)
52.6%
770
1465
1.2%
(50.0% - 55.1%)

Top Win rates of the top10 best performing least played combination of champions. Play rate [0.1

Archetype
WinRate
#Win
#Games
PlayRate
Conf.Interval
Championpile (NX/PZ)
63.8%
83
130
0.1%
(55.0% - 72.1%)
Garen/Taric (DE/MT)
62.1%
139
224
0.2%
(55.3% - 68.4%)
Quinn/Vayne (DE/PZ)
58.6%
360
614
0.5%
(54.6% - 62.6%)
Ezreal/Seraphine (IO/PZ)
57.9%
150
259
0.2%
(51.6% - 64.0%)
Katarina/Seraphine (NX/PZ)
57.4%
74
129
0.1%
(48.4% - 66.0%)
Diana/Leona (MT/SI)
56.8%
279
491
0.4%
(52.3% - 61.3%)
Elise/Gwen (NX/SI)
56.5%
222
393
0.3%
(51.4% - 61.5%)
Fizz/Seraphine (BW/PZ)
56.3%
81
144
0.1%
(47.7% - 64.5%)
Hecarim (IO/SI)
56.0%
84
150
0.1%
(47.7% - 64.1%)
Mistwraith Allegiance
55.7%
418
750
0.6%
(52.1% - 59.3%)
Ezreal/Seraphine (BC/PZ)
54.7%
182
333
0.3%
(49.1% - 60.1%)
Norra/Seraphine (BC/PZ)
54.0%
68
126
0.1%
(44.9% - 62.9%)
Udyr/Vayne (DE/FR)
53.9%
69
128
0.1%
(44.9% - 62.8%)
Teemo/Zoe (BC/MT)
53.4%
78
146
0.1%
(45.0% - 61.7%)
Kayn/Vayne (DE/RU)
53.0%
595
1122
0.9%
(50.1% - 56.0%)
Azir/Hecarim (SI/SH)
52.8%
84
159
0.1%
(44.8% - 60.8%)
Elise/Norra (BC/SI)
52.3%
79
151
0.1%
(44.0% - 60.5%)
Karma/Seraphine (IO/PZ)
52.1%
219
420
0.4%
(47.2% - 57.0%)
Jayce/Lux (DE/PZ)
52.0%
116
223
0.2%
(45.2% - 58.7%)
Akshan/Sivir (DE/SH)
51.9%
527
1015
0.9%
(48.8% - 55.0%)
Ezreal/Seraphine (PZ/SI)
51.8%
507
978
0.8%
(48.7% - 55.0%)
Nami/Seraphine (BW/PZ)
51.5%
328
637
0.5%
(47.5% - 55.4%)
Akshan/Renekton (FR/SH)
51.4%
142
276
0.2%
(45.4% - 57.5%)
Fizz/Nami (BW/RU)
50.5%
519
1028
0.9%
(47.4% - 53.6%)
Akshan/Varus (RU/SH)
50.0%
574
1147
1.0%
(47.1% - 53.0%)
1–25 of 28 rows

Match Ups

Regarding MU, this is not the most accurate estimation you can get from my data. If you want a better picture of the current meta it would be better to look at the dedicated MU-page where I use all “Ranked” games with the current sets of buffs and nerfs. While one may object I don’t account for optimizations and differences in skills acquired during the weeks, the overall number of games / sample size makes them a better source of information. So, in case, please refer to the MU - page for a better “meta-investigation”.

Match-up Grid

The win rates on the grid are among the 10 most played champion combination.

WR (WRmeta) Ezreal/Seraphine (NX/PZ) Seraphine/Viktor (IO/PZ) Hecarim/Zed (IO/SI) Jax/Vayne (DE/RU) Annie/Jhin (NX/RU) Rumble/Vayne (DE/NX) Seraphine/Viktor (PZ/SI) Vayne/Zed (DE/IO) Pantheon/Vayne (DE/MT) Pantheon/Varus (MT/RU)
Ezreal/Seraphine (NX/PZ)
53.2%
50.1%
NA
NA
40.6%
(37.7% - 43.6%)
53.2%
(49.7% - 56.5%)
39.9%
(36.4% - 43.6%)
51.9%
(48.1% - 55.6%)
66.4%
(62.9% - 69.8%)
49.0%
(44.8% - 53.2%)
50.9%
(46.4% - 55.4%)
48.2%
(43.8% - 52.6%)
57.8%
(53.2% - 62.3%)
Seraphine/Viktor (IO/PZ)
56.0%
53.3%
59.4%
(56.4% - 62.3%)
NA
NA
55.3%
(49.3% - 61.2%)
49.2%
(43.6% - 54.9%)
49.8%
(44.2% - 55.4%)
47.1%
(41.1% - 53.2%)
59.8%
(52.5% - 66.8%)
46.1%
(39.8% - 52.4%)
51.6%
(44.7% - 58.5%)
54.5%
(47.7% - 61.2%)
Hecarim/Zed (IO/SI)
48.5%
46.0%
46.8%
(43.5% - 50.3%)
44.7%
(38.8% - 50.7%)
NA
NA
45.9%
(39.3% - 52.5%)
37.4%
(30.8% - 44.4%)
48.2%
(41.6% - 55.0%)
47.6%
(40.6% - 54.6%)
39.4%
(31.8% - 47.4%)
53.3%
(44.6% - 61.9%)
54.1%
(45.7% - 62.4%)
Jax/Vayne (DE/RU)
54.1%
52.8%
60.1%
(56.4% - 63.6%)
50.8%
(45.1% - 56.4%)
54.1%
(47.5% - 60.7%)
NA
NA
46.4%
(38.9% - 54.0%)
51.8%
(44.5% - 59.1%)
47.6%
(39.8% - 55.5%)
44.5%
(36.5% - 52.7%)
38.8%
(30.7% - 47.5%)
48.2%
(38.8% - 57.8%)
Annie/Jhin (NX/RU)
52.8%
50.3%
48.1%
(44.4% - 51.9%)
50.2%
(44.6% - 55.8%)
62.6%
(55.6% - 69.2%)
53.6%
(46.0% - 61.1%)
NA
NA
52.1%
(45.2% - 59.0%)
27.2%
(20.7% - 34.6%)
55.6%
(47.6% - 63.5%)
59.5%
(50.4% - 68.2%)
74.3%
(66.1% - 81.4%)
Rumble/Vayne (DE/NX)
49.9%
46.0%
33.6%
(30.2% - 37.1%)
52.9%
(46.8% - 58.9%)
51.8%
(45.0% - 58.4%)
48.2%
(40.9% - 55.5%)
47.9%
(41.0% - 54.8%)
NA
NA
52.5%
(43.9% - 61.0%)
32.8%
(25.1% - 41.4%)
51.8%
(43.2% - 60.3%)
39.8%
(31.3% - 48.9%)
Seraphine/Viktor (PZ/SI)
53.7%
51.5%
51.0%
(46.8% - 55.2%)
40.2%
(33.2% - 47.5%)
52.4%
(45.4% - 59.4%)
52.4%
(44.5% - 60.2%)
72.8%
(65.4% - 79.3%)
47.5%
(39.0% - 56.1%)
NA
NA
50.5%
(40.2% - 60.8%)
43.1%
(33.4% - 53.3%)
57.0%
(47.1% - 66.5%)
Vayne/Zed (DE/IO)
53.3%
51.3%
49.1%
(44.6% - 53.6%)
53.9%
(47.6% - 60.2%)
60.6%
(52.6% - 68.2%)
55.5%
(47.3% - 63.5%)
44.4%
(36.5% - 52.4%)
67.2%
(58.6% - 74.9%)
49.5%
(39.2% - 59.8%)
NA
NA
45.5%
(34.8% - 56.4%)
40.6%
(30.7% - 51.1%)
Pantheon/Vayne (DE/MT)
52.8%
49.8%
51.8%
(47.4% - 56.2%)
48.4%
(41.5% - 55.3%)
46.7%
(38.1% - 55.4%)
61.2%
(52.5% - 69.3%)
40.5%
(31.8% - 49.6%)
48.2%
(39.7% - 56.8%)
56.9%
(46.7% - 66.6%)
54.5%
(43.6% - 65.2%)
NA
NA
32.3%
(23.1% - 42.6%)
Pantheon/Varus (MT/RU)
50.5%
48.1%
42.2%
(37.7% - 46.8%)
45.5%
(38.8% - 52.3%)
45.9%
(37.6% - 54.3%)
51.8%
(42.2% - 61.2%)
25.7%
(18.6% - 33.9%)
60.2%
(51.1% - 68.7%)
43.0%
(33.5% - 52.9%)
59.4%
(48.9% - 69.3%)
67.7%
(57.4% - 76.9%)
NA
NA
MatchUp values from Ranked games of the player who attended the last Seasonal Tournament Order of the Archetypes based on the playrate. Source: Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API

LoR-Meta Index (LMI)

Note: Games from Master Rank only

Tier0 with LMI 97.5 Tier1 with LMI [85,97.5) Tier2 with LMI [60,85) Tier3- with LMI < 60

The LMI

2 3 is an Index I developed to measure the performance of decks in the metagame. For those who are familiar with basic statistical concept I wrote a document to explain the theory behind it: , it’s very similar to vicioussyndicate (vS) Meta Score from their data reaper report. The score of each deck is not just their “strength”, it takes in consideration both play rates and win rates that’s why I prefer to say it measure the “performance”. The values range from 0 to 100 and the higher the value, the higher is the performance.

Win Marathons Leaders

Top3 Players (or more in case of ties) from each server that had the highest amount of consecutive wins with the same archetype. The provided deckcode is the one played in the last win found.

Top3 Biggest Win Streak by Server
Cumulative wins with the same Archetype
Player Result Archetype Deck Code
Americas
Hannah 15 Pyke/Rek'Sai (BW/SH)
塔博二号 15 Ezreal/Seraphine (NX/PZ)
西楚霸王刘波 15 Swain/Twisted Fate (BW/NX)
Apac
Aipotu就不是Ace呀 18 Ezreal/Seraphine (NX/PZ)
TheSixxy 18 Fiora/Vayne (DE/PZ)
conte110 15 Seraphine/Viktor (IO/PZ)
dango 15 Aphelios/Seraphine (MT/PZ)
Europe
Broken Ball 17 Seraphine/Viktor (IO/PZ)
LFR Shunpo 14 Seraphine/Viktor (IO/PZ)
Zanaiom 14 Ezreal/Seraphine (NX/PZ)
Games from all Master are collected each hour adding up to the last 20 matches. Unlikely but possible to miss games in case of high frequency games. Metadata of games collected with RiotGames API

Cards Presence (at Master)

 

Cards that couldn’t find place even in a meme deck.

BW
BC
PZ
IO
DE
NX
MT
RU
SI
SH
FR
Sunk Cost
Shark Trainer
Ferros Skycruiser
Swole Squirrel
Petricite Stag
Arrel the Tracker
Crystal Ibex
Sultur
Mistkeepers
Unworthy
Feral Mystic
Lounging Lizard
Furious Faefolk
Academy Prodigy
Pathless Ancient
Petricite Hound
Wrathful Rider
Porofly
Vora
Watcher on the Isles
Khahiri the Student
Entomb
Wise Fry
Mega Inferno Bomb
Jae Medarda
Nimble Poro
Plucky Poro
Weapons of the Lost
Freed Colossus
Steem
Sinister Poro
Vekauran Safecracker
Marai Greatmother
Yordle Newbie
Hextech Transmogulator
Sown Seeds
Vanguard Lookout
Legion Drummer
Against the Odds
Noxian Defector
Sap Magic
Brash Gambler
Pompous Cavalier
Golden Crushbot
Scaled Snapper
Vanguard Cavalry
Savage Reckoner
Spiral Stairs
Noxian Defector
Plunder Poro
Tornado Warrior
Eminent Benefactor
Cloud Drinker
Loyal Badgerbear
Noxian Defector
Mystifying Magician
Heroic Charge
Unstable Voltician
Yusari
Pompous Cavalier
Golden Narwhal
Keeper's Verdict
Amateur Aeronaut
The Empyrean
Steem
Bandle Painter
Intrepid Mariner
Shark Trainer
Paparo the Great
Furious Faefolk

Not-Standard Archetype Names

Names and rules for the “non standard archetypes” which are not defined by Champion+Regions

Archetype ~Fix
Deck Source
ASZ - Sivir Ionia Akshan/Sivir (IO/SH) or Sivir/Zed or Akshan/Sivir/Zed
BandleTree 3 copies of BandleTree
Camavoran Deserter 2+ Legion Deserter and 2+ Viego
Dragons (DE/MT) (DE/MT) Decks with *at least* Shyvana and ASol
Marauder (NX/FR) Two to Three copies of Both Legion Marauder and Strength in Numbers
Mistwraith Allegiance Three copies of both Mistwraith and Wraithcaller
Pack Your Catalogue (Regions) Three copies of Go Hard and 2+ of Catalogue of Regrets
Pirates (BW/NX) BW/NX deck with Miss Fortune and any of Twisted Fate, Gangplank
Plunder Pandemonium (Regions) 2+ Powder Pandemonium and at least 32 Bilgewater Cards
RubinBait - <Champ> Burn Deck using <Champ> to bait mulligan
Sentinel Control PnZ/SI deck any combination of Elise/Jayce/Vi
Kindred Control PnZ/SI deck any combination of Elise/Jayce/Vi AND Kindred
SunDisc Mono Shurima with 1+ Sun Disc - without Rek'Sai
Tri-Beam (NX/PZ) (NX/PZ) deck with at least 2 copies of Tri-Beam
Trundle Timelines (FR/PZ) Trundle and Concurrent Timelines
Viktor - Shellfolk Viktor + at least one of Curious Shellfolk/Mirror Mage + at least 2 Trinket Trade

Legal bla bla

This content was created under Riot Games ‘Legal Jibber Jabber’ policy using assets owned by Riot Games. Riot Games does not endorse or sponsor this project.

Footnotes

  1. HighDiamond are defined as “players who played against Master player in a Ranked games but are not Master themselves”[↩]
  2. LMI - Early Theory[↩]
  3. LMI - Adding a Ban Index[↩]